The Totalitarian Temptation- Again

By ACD/EWI | by Rachel Ehrenfeld, Ken Jensen
Tuesday, March 5th, 2013 @ 6:45AM

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Introduction

Todays European newspapers, magazines and academic journals, reveal that many are yearning to a form of government that will minimize — if not end — income disparity, redistribute wealth and put an end to social divides.

Since 2009, we have been witnessing the shrinking of already small number of pro-capitalist publications. Most have joined the chorus preaching a new world order that eerily reminds of George Orwell’s portrayal of the brave new world.

The growing pace in which such announcements are being made is disturbing, especially when one realizes that merely two decades after the failure of the communist/socialist totalitarian dogma of state owned failing industries, rampant poverty, inequality, discrimination, endemic corruption and lack of political and individual freedoms — the same reporters and politicians who spoke out against the failing regimes, are now preaching for their “updated” comeback.

But the preaching didn’t stay in old Continent. It has crossed the puddle and is making new waves of converts to a repugnant ideology antithetical to what America was built on and still is.

There are few veteran journalists who are as well grounded in history and political experience as Sol Sanders, formerly of Business Week covering Asia. While he generally writes on international economic topics, here he focuses on American politics and doesn’t hold back. His use of terms like “totalitarian” and “demagoguery” is neither reckless nor overblown for rhetorical effect. It’s the act of an historian and a good one. And imagine his chutzpah (or naiveté) in demanding that journalists think of themselves as historians.

Americans have had previous episodes of leaning towards authoritarian temptation offered by European Communism and Nazism. While some entertained them, most whitstood these temptations. Indeed, America survived the Progressive Era and Huey Long.

Europe, however, has long been sliding down the slippery slope of giving in. Perhaps early dementia prevents them from remembering the twentieth-century experience of three hideous totalitarian regimes in Germany, Russia, and Maoist China.

Statism, the rule of unelected elites, the failing welfare state, and stagnation induced by Labor Unions, is what the Europeans seem to prefer theses days. The likelihood that they can find the road back to democracy and free markets doesn’t look promising just now.

It is worrisome that the American are tempted to follow Europe’s lead despite what we see of Europe’s experience especially the rise of bureaucratic totalitarianism that rules Europe from Brussels, with un-cunning similarities to Beijing’s ruling its provinces.

Sanders hopes America wakes up soon again, and so do we.

~~~~~~~~
The Totalitarian Temptation — With Us Again

By Sol Sanders

March 4, 2013

We live in dangerous times. It’s not so much that the world economy threatens to crash, that our carefully nuanced political system in the U.S. is momentarily checkmated, or even that while the U.S. is running the highest unemployment rates in recent memory the European Community has not resolved its disintegrating common currency.

No, those are indeed serious concerns. Hopefully they are temporary. It is so easy to forget how serious such occurrences have been in the past and how basic American beliefs and initiatives have rescued us from the plight time and time again. Those widely repeated clichés about the first time, the largest ever, the worst in history, etc., are often as foolish as much else that appears in our increasingly illiterate media by journalists who have forgotten that their metier was supposed to be history.

What is much more threatening is that once again, as has happened in our history but rarely at the federal level, we are threatened by demagoguery masquerading as populist reformism. Those who would want “to transform” the American Republic are, alas(!), often those whose abysmal ignorance of our history and our institutions is apparent. But their appeal for facile (often termed “comprehensive”) solutions to complex problems that require repeated and detailed analyses and incremental remedial rather than revolutionary solutions is stronger than ever. In a new class of ill-educated but highly mobile elitists who know what is best for the rest of us, there is a growing tendency toward authoritarian rule.

What they neglect most of all is that 250 years of American governance has built established patterns of behavior as well as a rule of law which one tampers with at the risk of destroying the edifice. Our society is built and ruled on a structure unique to the political world in which it was created in the late 18th and early 19th century and remains much to this day very special and like none other. Cynics may scoff at “American exceptionalism” but everyone from serious political scientists to the Comintern have learned it is a truism: America is different. Only someone who does not know and appreciate American history, its trials and tribulations as well as its triumphs, could make a statement that U.S. uniqueness is simply another of the reflections of nation states in Europe.

The main reason is that the American Founders were an unusual collection of unusually well read and educated men for their time who, although many held sinecures, were revolutionaries in regard to their attitudes toward government. Whether slaveholders in Virginia or hardscrabble farmers in Massachusetts, they had the benefit of a European political tradition and most of all a British inheritance of individual freedom passed down as it had been secured, under often bitter and dangerous circumstances, class by class for generations.

But most of all they had an intuitive knowledge of human imperfection; they knew that no institutions could survive without being carefully crafted to avoid the domination of one man or one group of men or even one portion of the governing process. It was for that reason that the genius of the American constitution was separation of powers – which even Britain had not achieved and the failure of which in no small part helped bring on the American Revolution, a revolt initially for Englishman’s rights in the new colonies in North America, but eventually for redress before an overweening executive acting through parliamentary dictatorship.

Dividing the roles of government into legislative, executive and judicial was at the heart of the new American Republic which Benjamin Franklin said the Constitutional Convention had bequeathed Americans “if they could keep it”. Never has it been more threatened as it is today by an extremely popular president who has the temerity to publicly espouse a course of action where he will use the vast power of his office to achieve what he considers a worthy end when the tangled but necessary Congressional procedure does not produce.

History isn’t taught any more in our schools. And our media, captivated by every superficiality, whether from Hollywood or their own creation, is largely ignorant of it. This veteran journalist shudders at a sycophantic, giggling reporter making googoo eyes and saccharine suggestions through pseudo-questions at what was once a forum for ideas in the White House press conference.

Unfortunately, there is a decided ring to the noises coming out of Washington now, and they resemble nothing so much as the attempt by Huey Long of Louisiana in the early 1930s to capture the popular imagination for a near-dictatorship in his own state and with a threat to carry it on to a national level with the help of a rogue priest, Father Charles Couglin of Michigan. Had he not been cut down by an assassin’s bullet, he might well have imitated the roles of the European dictators who took over in the 1930s and led the world into bloody World War II.

Long, too, made attacks on “the rich”, exalted giveaway social programs, and initiated grandiose proposals for infrastructure as his bait for the unsuspecting voter, caught up in the toils of The Great Depression. Long before Hitler’s Josef Goebbels pointed out the significance of The Big Lie — out and out prevarication of the truth with no limits as more successful than eating around the edges of truth as more effective — Long spun them.

The President in a rare moment of self-abnegation said recently in a public forum that he was not a dictator. We shall hold him to that admission. While we must be on the alert for the kinds of usurpation of public trust and power that have characterized so many other countries in the last century, this writer is optimistic that it cannot happen here. If for no other reason, while Mussolini made the trains run on time, as they said, and Hitler built the autobahns, and Stalin modernized the Russian army, our gang of Kartzenjammer kids seems incapable of doing much of anything right except pandering to their benighted constituencies.

Whether it is their incredibly ideological warped energy strategy blown clear apart by the shale gas revolution they had nothing to do with (what a joke that the new nominee for energy secretary glows in the light of the vast new gas reserves!) or their bumbling foreign policy, which waffles into insignificance, this is the gang that couldn’t shoot straight. And we will survive them as we have other travesties in our history.

A version of this column is scheduled to be published on http://worldtribune.com


Categories: ACD/EWI Blog

On The Campaign Trail

Check the dates and see when we're in your town!