Crimean Tatars and Jihad

By Rachel Ehrenfeld
Friday, March 14th, 2014 @ 1:24AM

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Left: Crimean Tatars hold flags during rallies near the Crimean parliament building in Simferopol this week. (Baz Ratner/Reuters)

In seizing Crimea, Vladimir Putin may well have bitten off more than he can chew.  This, not because he lacks the power to suppress all opposition to a Russian takeover there, including the Crimean Tatars, but because jihadis may flock there in defense of the local Muslims. Moreover, jihadis everywhere are likely to target Russian interests outside the confines of Crimea as well.

While the historical plight of the Crimean Tatars is well known, reporting about it seems to stop with their wholesale expulsion from the peninsula by Stalin during WWII. The assumption is that the Tatars, out of gratitude for being allowed back into Crimea, have caused no trouble to Russia.  This isn’t so.

In the mid-1990s, the Tatars blocked a bid by local Russian nationalists to move Crimea out of Ukrainian and into Russian hands.  This was done via civil disobedience, putting people in front of trucks to keep them from delivering food and fuel, and hunger strikes.  Since then, the Tatars have supported Ukraine’s Orange Revolution and opposed pro-Russian Yanukovych’s election in 2010.

Current media reports on the Tatars’ state of mind agree that, on the whole, they wish to avoid political or armed confrontation.  Tatar leaders have forbidden street protests in favor of calling for a boycott of the March 16 referendum on rejoining Russia. However, self-defense measures have been taken in the form of nightly neighborhood patrols and constant surveillance of Russian forces.  Some encrypted communications lines have been set up in case of the need for a quick evacuation from Tatar villages and homes. There is also an ominous report that Russians have put ‘Xs’ on homes in the traditional Tatar capital of Bakchisarai.

After Yanukovych left Ukraine, some 20,000 Crimean Tatars held a rally in support of the new pro-Western government. A confrontation by a smaller pro-Russian rally left more than 20 people injured.

While some commentators still maintain that relations between Tatars, Russians, and Ukrainians have been largely peaceful in Crimea, such is not the case. Russian attacks on Tatars have been common and largely the work of Crimea’s nationalist party, Russia Unity, whose leader, Sergei Aksyonov, is now the Russian-installed prime minister.  Attacks have taken the form of fire bombings of mosques and Tatar businesses and desecration of Tatar monuments and graves.

On March 8, in a letter of appeal for help to President Obama, Refat Chubarov, Chairman of the Mejlis (i.e., assembly) of the Crimean Tatar People, said:

“The multicultural population of Crimea is particularly anxious about the numerous groups of ‘Cossacks’, ­members of paramilitary organizations who have been brought en mass to Crimea from Krasnodar region and other territories of the Russian Federation in order to destabilize the situation, as well as about arming of so called ‘self-defense squads’ led by the putschists while the civil population remains unarmed. … Who and when will avert a threat of new ethnic cleansings that could occur in Crimea in case of violent conflicts, provoked by military and their accomplices from the paramilitary organizations?”

If the ‘unmarked’ soldiers in Crimea are really cossacks, then Putin has indeed gone back to the 19th century. If he aims to ethnically cleanse Crimea of its Tatars, he may find them not as placid or unprepared as assumed. As ACD’s J. Millard Burr has shown, Crimean Muslims have been receiving their share of Islamist proselytism. Reportedly, at least 100 of them are presently fighting alongside the rebels in Syria. Moreover, there are signs that some Tatars have organized themselves into guerrilla groups, while the international Sunni jihadist movement has taken up the Tatar cause.

If Putin isn¹t very careful, he is likely to end up with increasing jihadist attacks in both Crimea and Russia.  RT reports of a new Russian propaganda campaign aimed at the Tatars via the Russian-controlled Crimean parliament. It has passed a resolution that guarantees proportional representation in legislative and executive bodies for the Tatars and makes their language for the first time official.  The parliament also recognizes now as ‘official’ Crimean Tatar self-governance bodies starting with the Qurultay (a sort of general assembly).  It seems doubtful that the Mejlis will be included. 

Read‘s Adi Kochavi’s and Rachel Levy’s report regarding the seriousness and extent of the jihadi call to arms in Crimea.

Jihadis Are Seething at Russia Over Crimea—Will It Boil Over?  Some are calling on Muslims to travel to Ukraine to take up arms for their Crimean brothers

With Russia and Ukraine in a tense standoff over the fate of Crimea, jihadis are bashing Russia in their forums and social media accounts. In some cases, they’re even calling on Muslims to travel to Eastern Ukraine to defend their religious brothers.

This week, the hashtag #NafirforUkraine began making the rounds on Twitter. The Islamic Arabic term “Nafir” is a call to action that requires any member of a jihadi group to travel to the country Nafir is called against and participate in a holy war in the name of Allah. Nafir was declared in the early stages of the conflicts in Syria and Egypt, and it helped spark jihadi migrations into these nations.

In this case, there’s no evidence yet of radical Muslim fighters flocking to Crimea to team up with the Muslim minority living there, but the #NafirforUkraine hashtag has been used more than 1,000 times, predominantly in tweets from Saudi Arabia.

One tweeter offered advice on traveling to Ukraine, suggesting that Turkey is the best route into the country.

MAR 01, 2014 16:58 UTC@MISSDIOR456

#النفير_لأوكرانيا بدأ النفير من تركيا إلى القرم وتركيا نقطة الانطلاق

“The Nafir to Crimea has started and Turkey is the starting point.”


Another tweeter claimed that jihadis had already arrived to fight in Crimea.

MAR 01, 2014 20:35 UTC@WALEEDMOSTAFA17

ستخرج علينا قناة بن جدو (الميادين) بخبر عاجل مفاده .. أن هناك أدلة متزايدة عن وصول مقاتلين عرب مؤيدين لثورة أوكرانيا لشبه جزيزة القرم

“The Channel of Bin Jadu (Almayadin) breaking news… There is increasing evidence that Arab fighters who support the Ukrainian Revolution are arriving to the Crimean island.”

But on the ground in Crimea, there was little evidence of an influx of Muslim fighters. Tatars in some villages were organizing into round-the-clock patrols to prepare for possible attacks, but so far there was more anticipation of conflict than any signs of actual conflict.

The enmity between Russia and Islam stretches back centuries to the era of Catherine the Great, when mosques were banned and Muslims were systematically repressed. The same happened in the USSR—though it happened with all religions under communist rule—and the tensions have reignited in the past decade, with Vladimir Putin openly targeting Muslims in the North Caucasus in an attempt to root out extremists and squash separatist movements. The conflict between Moscow and Chechnya in the late 1990s and early 2000s brought this to the fore, as Chechnya is predominantly Muslim.

The question now is whether that long bad blood between Russia and Islam will serve as a spark in Crimea.

In addition to the heightened activity on social networks, some radical Muslims affiliated with groups like the Free Syrian Army, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood have been using member forums and Facebook pages this week to galvanize their supporters around the Crimean conflict. The posts focus on Tatars, the Muslim group that accounts for about 10 percent of the population in Crimea. Often using pictures and language chosen to elicit an emotional reaction, the forums discuss the Tatars’ plight and detail their mistreatment by the Russians.


The Vocativ deep web team focused on chatter in online forums and on social media platforms specifically discussing the Caucasus countries, in a variety of languages. By drilling down into active topics and their related offshoots, it became apparent that discussion of how an influx of Islamic fighters might look was rapidly heating up. While much of this is idle chatter among people at the periphery of the discussion, our proprietary tools enable us to review the information at scale and reduce it down, identifying key influencers with identifiable track records who are at the heart of the conversation and may be persons whose opinions shape the movement going forward.

One of these forums, Hanein, is an Al Qaeda-connected site that frequently disseminates propaganda and is used to recruit members and pass on tactical know-how to active fighters.

An Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Facebook page, which has almost half a million likes, referred to the Tatar community as their fellow Muslim compatriots. They provided videos showing the loyalty of the Tatars to their Sunni brothers in Syria.

On a forum related to the conflict in Syria and affiliated with the Free Syrian Army, members spoke about the Tatar leader, Mustafa Cemil, declaring that jihadis are ready to resist the Russian occupation.

We also talked with Fazil Amzayev, a representative for the Crimean Hizb ut-Tahrir, a group that seeks to establish Islamic rule in Muslim countries and that has been blamed for promoting radicalism in some places. “If there will be some conflict, I think that Muslims will come here. It is natural now in all Muslims countries if there is a war, then fighters from different countries try to come,” he says, adding that he hopes Crimea doesn’t become a war zone.

“We ask God for this conflict not to go on,” Amzayev says. “I think it may become another Pakistan, Afghanistan [or] Syria.”


Screengrab of Kavkaz Center website

An Al Qaeda-affiliated news outlet called the Kavkaz center reported Wednesday that a number of followers have asked whether it’s OK, from a religious standpoint, to fight alongside non-Muslim forces against a common enemy. The publishers of the site concluded that Muslims are allowed to fight with any non-Muslim forces in Ukraine against Russian troops.

We wrote earlier this week about the possibility that Muslims and Christians in Crimea, united by their antipathy for Russia, could join forces. A spokesperson for the far-right Christian group Pravy Sektor says the Muslim Tatars are their “closest ally.” Artem Skoropadskyi also says the Tatars are very organized and well-equipped to defend themselves if fighting breaks out.

Pravy Sektor played a key role in the Ukraine protests that toppled the country’s president, and were often leading the violent confrontations with security forces. They have released videos depicting their training methods, which are reminiscent of those Al Qaeda released. Pravy Sektor says they are already cooperating with the Tatars.

More of those kinds of partnerships could potentially turn Crimea into a messy war zone. It happened in Syria in a dramatic way. What began as a war between two sides morphed into an extremely complex conflict, as foreign fighters entered the fray. By some estimates, there are fighters from some 80 different countries taking part in that battle, with combatants coming from all over Europe, the Middle East and even parts of Asia.

Posted March 7, 2014, on Vocativ.Com

Categories: ACD/EWI Blog, Al Qaeda, Latest News, Russia and East Europe, Ukraine

On The Campaign Trail

Check the dates and see when we're in your town!