• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Mission
      • Political Islam
    • Areas of Expertise
      • Economic Warfare
        • Cyber Security
      • U.S. Policy
      • Anti-Corruption
      • Foreign Election Observing
      • Supporting Free Speech
        • Legislation
      • Impact of ACD’s Work
      • Free Speech Celebration, U.S. Senate
    • Board of Directors & Advisors
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
  • Our Impact
    • Endorsements
    • Additional Praise
  • Media
    • Recent Interviews
    • Events
      • Coming Events
    • Radio
    • Television
    • Rumble / Youtube
  • Publications
    • All Posts Archive
    • ACD Presentations
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Papers
    • Recommended Readings
  • Free Speech
    • Legislation & Support
    • Impact of ACD’s Work
      • FREE SPEECH Act Celebration, U.S. Senate, September 20, 2010
      • Some Congressional Testimonies
  • Economic warfare
    • The Impact of Purposeful Interference on U.S. Cyber Interests
    • Cyber/Space, EMP Insecurity- Current and Future Threats
    • The Existential EMP Threat
    • New Strategies to Secure U.S. Economy from Cyber Attacks
    • Economic Warfare Subversions July 9, 2012
    • CyberSpace Security – Papers And Articles
    • Cyber Security
    • Da’esh “lite” North America Islamist – Sources
    • The Muslim Brotherhood and Da’esh “Lite” in North America
  • Support ACD
    • Donate
    • Subscribe
    • Contact
American Center for Democracy

American Center for Democracy

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • linkedin
  • Free Speech
  • U.S. Policy
    • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • Political Islam
    • Canada
    • Hamas
    • Iran
    • Islam
    • Muslim Brotherhood
    • Palestinian
    • United States
  • Narco-Terrorism
  • Middle East Conflicts
    • Iran
    • Israel
  • Global Conflicts
    • China
    • North Korea
    • Russia
    • Ukraine
  • Soros
You are here: Home / ACD/EWI Blog / Obama’s “Successful” Foreign Policies

Obama’s “Successful” Foreign Policies

August 1, 2013 by Rachel Ehrenfeld

The Obama administration hardly regards itself to have failed at anything. In fact, it judges itself by its intentions, not by its results. Hillary Clinton, in her first major foreign policy speech in 2009, put the Obama approach on the table. To paraphrase: If we succeed around the world, it will be because of our honorable commitment to process (read: “engaging our enemies”). If we fail, it’s because previous administrations have made mistakes and have given Mr. Obama a “bad hand” to play. In fact, Hillary’s speech suggested, as often echoed by Obama, that all of American foreign policy history was at fault, most especially things like U.S. recognition of Israel, CIA activity in Iran, our supporting dictators to assure the flow of oil, etc. Clinton made it clear that the administration is committed to “process” and must not be held accountable for the results of its policies.

Just to remind one of the most glaring failures, we mention Iraq; Afghanistan; Libya; Egypt; al-Qaeda terrorism from the Maghreb to West Africa to Yemen to Azerbaijan and Central Asia, to Southeast Asia; Iran; Syria; Turkey; China; South America (Venezuela, Ecuador, Argentina, to name a few); Central America and the Caribbean; and Russia. “Enough already!” you say. But let’s not leave out cyber and intelligence security, not to mention embassy security (Benghazi).

The administration’s motives in pressuring Israel into “peace talks” with a Palestinian Authority that does not acknowledge the country’s right to exist, is unclear. U.S., Secretary of State John Kerry’s effort flies in the face of insurmountable problems: Mahmoud Abbas, who is in the ninth year of a four-year term as head of the Palestinian Authority-but not Gaza, where Hamas rules-has no ability to enforce agreements with anyone; the PA supports and sustains violence against Israelis; and no Arab state really wants peace between the parties, in fact most-as members of the Arab League-call for the destruction of Israel.

Thinking fancifully about what a settlement would look like only leads to the conclusion that it is impossible. Over the years the U.S. and the international community have poured billions into the West Bank and Gaza. The notion has been to provide the Palestinians with the wherewithal to create a state, that is, a sovereign entity with a government that could keep order and help its people to prosper economically. What the funding has created is a military force that often abuses its power against its own brothers, and a spectacularly and continuously corrupt government. The Palestinian Authority is always broke and has had to be bailed out by the West every couple of months when it rediscovers that it cannot pay its employees, whose numbers are steadily growing.

One could go on and on, but perhaps the way to put things is to say that the only way a Palestinian state could exist alongside Israel is if it recognizes the Jewish state, renounces and punishes all violence against Israel, and eliminates all anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli teaching and propaganda in schools, TV and the media. Despite the ongoing hate-mongering and incitement against Israel and the Jews, U.S., European, Arab and other international aid continues to flow to the PA and Gaza (Hamas).

The number of Obama’s foreign policy failures depends on how and what one counts. The new U.S. forced Israeli-Palestinian peace “process” will be at least the Obama administration’s 17th foreign policy failure, or only the 16th or maybe the 18th. Keep in mind Hillary’s and Obama’s insistence that all previous American foreign policy achievements were in fact failures. Recognizing that leads to the conclusion that the Obama administration’s failures have been the result of deliberate efforts. Not surisingly, they are touted as successes by this administration.

The Palestinians’ constant refusal to meet face-to-face with the Israelis was mitigated by a letter of gaurantee from Hillary’s successor to Obama’s foreign policy agenda, John Kerry. In it, Kerry is said to have promised the Palestinians terroitories that belong to the sovereign democratric Jewish state of Israel. In return, the Arab/Muslim block that supports the Palestinians would feed Obama’s illusionary diplomatic sucess. We hope Israel will not be forced to pay the price for this “success.”

Further Reading:

Noah Pollak: What Does Martin Indyk Believe?

Lee Smith: Requiem for the Peace Process: With the latest round of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, Middle East diplomacy has entered its mannerist phase.

Filed Under: ACD/EWI Blog, Latest News, U.S. Policy

Primary Sidebar

Spotlight

website capture islamist incitement quote by j.woolsey obama signing Rachel's law chemical terrorism transportation terrorism nuclear threats on the rise winning the cyberwar gps concepts and misconceptions libel tourism

Search ACD

Recent Appearances

[9/29/2025] The Shilling Show

[9/2/2025] Wake Up Patriots

[8/29/2025] Decoding Soros

[5/1/2025] National Talk Radio with Shawn Moore

[3/11/2025] Shaun Thompson Interview

[3/10/2025] Larry Conners Interviews Rachel Ehrenfeld

[2/3/2025] The Truth About George Soros - Grey Matter Podcast

[1/22/2025] Fighting Terrorism Funding - SAM Podcast

[1/8/2025] COUNTER NARRATIVE Interview on PATRIOT.TV

[10/2/2024] The Shaun Thompson Show: Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld

[9/30/2024] Counter Narrative: Soros Power Grab: Media Takeover & Election Manipulation |

See All Appearances

The Soros Agenda

g. soros

Soros: The Man Who Would Be Kingmaker, Part I

Rachel Ehrenfeld & Shawn Macomber

Soros: The Man Who Would Be Kingmaker, Part II

Soros: The Man Who Would be Kingmaker, Part III

Soros: The Man Who Would be Kingmaker, Part IV

More about Soros...
ORDER THE SOROS AGENDA →
Buy The Soros Agenda

Tags

antisemitism Caliphate Canada capital punishment China Christians Daniel Haqiqatjou Dawah Disinformation genocide Hamas Iran ISIS Islam Islamic Party of Ontario Islamic Relief Canada Islamic Relief Worldwide Islamization Islamophobia Israel J. Millard Burr Jews jihad Justin Trudeau LGBT liberalism Muslim Brotherhood Muslims NCCM Norman Bailey Palestine Political Islam Quran Russia Salaheddin Islamic Centre Saudi Arabia Sharia Sol W. Sanders SOROS Syria Terrorism Toronto US USA women's rights

Footer

About ACD

ACD is a New York-based 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization, which monitors and exposes the enemies of freedom and their modus operandi, and explores pragmatic ways to counteract their methods.

Endorsements

"The ACD/EWI ability to predict future threats is second to none"

- R. James Woolsey, former Director of Central Intelligence

- - - More Endorsements - - -

Follow ACD!

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • linkedin

Copyright © 2025 | The American Center for Democracy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.