• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Mission
      • Political Islam
    • Areas of Expertise
      • Economic Warfare
        • Cyber Security
      • U.S. Policy
      • Anti-Corruption
      • Foreign Election Observing
      • Supporting Free Speech
        • Legislation
      • Impact of ACD’s Work
      • Free Speech Celebration, U.S. Senate
    • Board of Directors & Advisors
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
  • Our Impact
    • Endorsements
    • Additional Praise
  • Media
    • Events
      • Coming Events
    • Radio
    • Television
    • Youtube
  • Publications
    • All Posts Archive
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Papers
    • Presentations
    • Recommended Readings
  • Free Speech
    • Legislation & Support
    • Impact of ACD’s Work
      • Free Speech Celebration, U.S. Senate
      • Some Congressional Testimonies
      • 9/2010: SPEECH Act Celebration
  • Economic warfare
    • The Impact of Purposeful Interference on U.S. Cyber Interests
    • Cyber/Space, EMP Insecurity- Current and Future Threats
    • The Existential EMP Threat
    • New Strategies to Secure U.S. Economy from Cyber Attacks
    • Economic Warfare Subversions July 9, 2012
    • CyberSpace Security – Papers And Articles
    • Cyber Security
    • Da’esh “lite” North America Islamist – Sources
    • The Muslim Brotherhood and Da’esh “Lite” in North America
  • Support ACD
    • Donate
    • Subscribe
    • Contact
American Center for Democracy

American Center for Democracy

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • linkedin
  • Free Speech
  • U.S. Policy
    • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • Political Islam
    • Canada
    • Hamas
    • Iran
    • Islam
    • Muslim Brotherhood
    • Palestinian
    • United States
  • Narco-Terrorism
  • Middle East Conflicts
    • Iran
    • Israel
  • Global Conflicts
    • China
    • North Korea
    • Russia
    • Ukraine
  • Soros
You are here: Home / ACD/EWI Blog / Time to Debunk Political Islam

Time to Debunk Political Islam

May 29, 2014 by Rachel Ehrenfeld

Islamism has been accepted by the West as simply another political point of view, and its growing efforts and sometimes violent acts to force its dictates has been met with little, if any resistance especially since September 11, 2001.

On May 23, 2014, the Sunday Review of the New York Times published an op-ed by Shadi Hamid. In “The Brotherhood Will Be Back,” the author, a fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center, put political Islam’s cards on the table:

“Liberals would say that their solution is the only acceptable compromise. In a liberal society, everyone—secular and Salafi alike—can freely express their religious preferences. But the notion that liberalism is ‘neutral’ can be accepted only within a liberal framework. Islamists cannot fully express their Islamism in a strictly secular state.”

While subtly making the usual arguments about moderate and extremist Islamists, Hamid points out Islamism’s growing role in the Arab Spring phenomenon.  And since the majority of people in Muslim countries, he claims, believes in the superiority of Shari’a Law, it ought to be the law of the land whatever the political regime.

Mohammed Morsi’s ouster in Egypt should not, therefore, be regarded as a meaningful expression of popular will against theocratic dictatorship. After all, like all Muslim Brotherhood supporters, Hamid reminds us that Morsi was democratically elected. He does not consider the popular uprising, the will of tens of millions of Egyptians demonstrating to remove Morsi, to mean anything.

Hamid, like Anwar Ibrahim — the failed Malaysian politician who’s similar gibberish to promote ‘Democracy according to Islam’ won him many influential friends among Western political elites — argues for Islamic democracy ( an oxymoron). He says that “contrary to academic and popular wisdom, [democracy] is likely to push Islamist parties toward greater liberalism. In religiously conservative societies, there is widespread support for more mixing of religion and politics, not less.”

Hamid’s main point, apart from softening his readers’ cold hearts regarding the Brotherhood and Islamists everywhere, is to argue “the fundamental inability of secular state systems to accommodate Islamist participation in the democratic process.”  In this, he seems to define democracy as merely an electoral choice.  He poses to the West what he calls a “thorny question”: “Do Arabs have the right to decide—through the democratic process—that they would rather not be liberal?”

If Hamid only meant to point out that liberal democracy and “Islamic Democracy” are incompatible, he’s correct.  However, he asserts that since there are Islamists, there must be “Islamic democracy” that all the world should recognize as legitimate.  Thus, it’s “the Shari’a way or the highway.”

Since the political rise of the Brotherhood in Egypt, Western liberals have chosen to believe that Islamism (not only the Brotherhood’s version but also Qatar’s—where Western tourists are now warned to dress modestly—Saudi Arabia’s and even Iran’s) tempered by power and political, economic, and social responsibility would bring the Muslim world into rough concordance with Western values.  Hamid plays upon this.  He also plays upon the West’s disaffection with itself by suggesting a fundamental weakness of secular liberalism, i.e., that it really cannot accommodate Islam.

If liberalism has succeeded in accommodating other monotheisms, polytheisms, and even atheism without fundamental and violent opposition from Christians, Jews, and the followers of other religions, then the incompatibility of liberal democracy and Islam tells more about Islam than it does about liberalism.

If some Middle Eastern states become Islamist politically, good luck to them as long as they mind their own business.  That they do so must not be seen as either the West’s fault due to it’s repressive acts of the past or to the inferiority of its political values.

If Hamid’s Brothers come back, let it not be with our help.  It’s time for the West to defend itself at home, to challenge contorted propaganda publicly, whether it comes from Islamists or Politically Correct and otherwise muddled Westerners.

The rise of anti-Muslim European and Russian nationalism, the kind most Westerners have learned to dread, should be enough to stop Western political and social accommodation of, and submission to, Islamist demands.

Filed Under: ACD/EWI Blog, Islam, Latest News, Middle East Conflicts, Muslim Brotherhood, Shari'a, U.S. Policy

Primary Sidebar

ORDER THE SOROS AGENDA ...
Buy The Soros Agenda

Search ACD

Categories

The Soros Agenda

g. soros

Soros: The Man Who Would Be Kingmaker, Part I

Rachel Ehrenfeld & Shawn Macomber

Soros: The Man Who Would Be Kingmaker, Part II

Soros: The Man Who Would be Kingmaker, Part III

Soros: The Man Who Would be Kingmaker, Part IV

Spotlight

quote by j.woolsey obama signing Rachel's law chemical terrorism transportation terrorism nuclear threats on the rise islamist incitement winning the cyberwar gps concepts and misconceptions libel tourism

Tags

antisemitism Caliphate Canada capital punishment China Christians Daniel Haqiqatjou Dawah Disinformation genocide Hamas Iran ISIS Islam Islamic Party of Ontario Islamic Relief Canada Islamization Islamophobia Israel J. Millard Burr Jews jihad Justin Trudeau LGBT liberalism Liberal Party Muslim Brotherhood Muslims NCCM Norman Bailey Ontario Palestine Political Islam Quran Russia Salaheddin Islamic Centre Saudi Arabia Sharia Sol W. Sanders SOROS Syria Terrorism Toronto US women's rights

Footer

About ACD

ACD is a New York-based 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization, which monitors and exposes the enemies of freedom and their modus operandi, and explores pragmatic ways to counteract their methods.

Endorsements

"The ACD/EWI ability to predict future threats is second to none"

- R. James Woolsey, former Director of Central Intelligence

- - - More Endorsements - - -

Follow ACD!

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • linkedin

Copyright © 2023 | The American Center for Democracy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.