Iran Sanctions to Reverse Obama’s “Iran-First” Policy

By Rachel Ehrenfeld @ Ameican Thinker
Tuesday, June 13th, 2017 @ 1:38AM

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmail
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The latest confirmation of the Obama administration’s support of Iran’s terrorist activities was provided to the House Foreign Affairs Committee on June 8, 2017, by David Asher, who for many years worked with the United States government on counter-terrorist- financing related issues. According to Asher, “In narrow pursuit of the P5 + 1 agreement, the administration…systematically disbanded any… action …to dismantle Hizballah and the Iran “Action Network” … [for fear these would] derail the administration’s policy agenda focused on Iran.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA), who chairs the Committee, denounced the Obama administration in April 2016, for allowing Iran “to launder dollars while the administration looked the other way.” The hearing he held last week aimed at finding new ways to curb Iran’s and Hizballah’s international crime syndicates that fund their terrorist activities.

One day before the Senate voted on advancing the “Countering Iran’s Destabilizing Activities Act of 2017,” former Sec. of State Kerry argued against “the danger” of new sanctions. “Our bellicosity is pushing them into a corner,” and the imposition of new sanctions after old ones were relaxed with Obama’s deal with Iran, could be seen as a “provocation” by Iran, he warned. His former counterpart, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif followed suit, calling the newly proposed sanctions “repugnant.”

Obama is no longer the president, but Democrats in Congress continue his “Iran-First” legacy. Last week, 92 Senators voted to advance with the “Countering Iran’s Destabilizing Activities Act of 2017” to impose new sanctions on Iran’s ballistic missile program, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, enforce arms embargoes, and block assets of individuals engaged in terrorism and human rights violations in Iran. The six Senators who voted against, Carper (D-DE); Durbin (D-IL); Feinstein (D-CA); Gillibrand (D-NY); Merkley (D-OR), and Sanders (I-VT), argued in favor of postponing the vote “as a goodwill gesture” to the Iranians after last weeks ISIS attack on the Parliament and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s shrine in Teheran.

Incredibly, Sen. Carper called to “hit the pause button,” suggesting the sanctions would be akin to “rubbing salt into a wound… let’s wait a few days and consider what to do,” he said. Displaying his lack of minimal understanding of Mullahs’ terrorist regime, he argued, “If we were in their shoes, I think we would appreciate that gesture.” One wonders why Sen. Carper and his colleagues continue to call for “good will gestures” towards Iran who unfailingly proved its hostility to the U.S. The Obama “Iran-First” policy followers in Congress have been demonstrating a dangerous delusion that Iran, which supports global terrorism, supply arms that kill American soldiers in the Middle East and Afghanistan advancing their own and North Korea’s nuclear agenda, encouraging mobs chanting “death to America,” “Death to Israel,” and “Death to Saudi Arabia” are friends, not cunning maniacal enemies of the U.S.

The savvy Iranians are quick to adopt the pro-Iran Democrats’ phrases when protesting the against U.S. sanctions. On Monday, Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi, echoed Sen. Carper, saying the new sanctions show ““lack of goodwill.” Another Iranian official, like former Sec. Kerry claimed Iran sees the new sanctions as “shameful” and in violation of “the principle of goodwill and successful implementation of the JCPOA.”

The Trump administration’s efforts to curb Iran’s ballistic missiles development and terrorist financing are likely to be hindered by leftover Obama loyalists in the government who followed Obama’s orders to even launder billions of dollars in clear violation of U.S. laws. Such activities were carried since March 2012, when some sanctions lifting began to incentivize Iran to attend the negotiations in Geneva. At that time, “Nobody could pay the Iranians via normal lines, not even in euros” a European oil trader was quoted saying. How then did Iran access the payments? Were offshore dollar clearing houses used already then to launder the money sent to Iranian banks? Was the same system used for each financial “reward” Obama handed Iran to come back/continue the negotiations?

To ease economic sanction and payments to Iran and to sidestep Congress, James Clapper, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence removed Iran and Hezbollah as sponsors of terrorism from the “Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Communities,” in February 2015. The loud criticism of this report, apparently, kept both on the U.S. government designation as terrorists, but the money to Iran kept flowing.

On January 16, 2016, when Obama announced the signing of the JCPOA, he did not mention that Iran will be allowed to trade in U.S. dollars through offshore dollar clearing. “The president instructed to change the venue through which Iran could access and launder the U.S. dollar, all the while admitting that some of that money will be used to advance the terrorist agenda of terrorist-designated Islamic Republic of Iran.” His State Secretary John Kerry’s acknowledged publicly that money given to Iran would be given to terrorists. “When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups. “I think that some of it will end up in the hands of the IRGC or other entities, some of which are labeled terrorists.”

On October 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department updated its “Frequently Asked Questions Relating to the Lifting of Certain U.S. Sanctions Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),” that allowed  foreign (i.e. non-U.S.) financial institutions to engage in offshore U.S. dollar clearing as long as US financial institutions were not involved” and as long as they “ensure[d] that a counterparty is not owned more than 50% by the IRGC or its affiliates/agents.”

The new sanctions on Iran should prevent any money going to any business, organizations, and individuals involved in the regime’s overt and covert military operations. The Trump administration’s efforts to curb Iran’s activities would also be helped by finding out how much money did the Obama administration funnel to Iran and its proxies since he took office in 2009.

This commentary was published by American Thinker, June 13, 2017.

FOLLOW US
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinyoutubeFacebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinyoutube


Categories: Iran-First policy, Kelly, Latest News, Obama, Trump, US IRAN SANCTIONS