Legislation

See Support for Legislation

SPEECH Act of 2010

Public Law 111-223: Securing and Protecting our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act (SPEECH Act

Sponsored by U.S. Senators Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Arlen Specter (D-PA), Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), Joseph I. Lieberman (I-CT) and Edward E. Kaufman (D-DE).

Sponsored by U.S. Representatives Steve Cohen (D-TN-9), Darrell E. Issa (R-CA-49), John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI-14), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY-8), Trent Franks (R-AZ-2), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA-16), Howard Coble (R-NC-6), Ted Poe (R-TX-2), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX-18), Brad Sherman (D-CA-27), Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr. (D-GA-4) and Daniel B. Maffei (D-NY-25).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by President Barack Obama on August 10, 2010.

Additional Views of Senator Jon Kyl:

The complementary freedoms of speech and the press enshrined by our founding fathers in the First Amendment are cornerstones of American society. As Thomas Jefferson famously said, ‘‘Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it.’’ The importance of these freedoms has not diminished with time. Regrettably, many other countries place

Regrettably, many other countries place lesser value on free expression and do not provide the strong legal protection for speech and the press that exists in the United States. These nations’ judicial systems have, in many instances, become home to a practice known as ‘‘libel tourism,’’ which occurs when an individual brings a libel or defamation suit against an American in a country with less protective free speech laws. Plaintiffs are increasingly engaging in global forum shopping in an effort to silence journalists, authors, publishers, and others who are merely exercising their First Amendment rights.

There can be no doubt that American citizens’ rights of free expression are being abridged by this practice. Indeed, some Americans are falling victim to an international race to the bottom—they are able to write or publish only material that would be allowed in countries with the weakest free speech protections.

Although libel tourism conflicts with American values, it has proven to be an effective way to silence criticism. Several high-profile cases illustrate how libel tourism stifles free speech, perhaps none better known than the case of Rachel Ehrenfeld. In 2003, Dr. Ehrenfeld published Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It, which detailed how Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz financed terrorism. In response, bin Mahfouz and two members of his family filed suit against Dr. Ehrenfeld in Britain to take advantage of that country’s expansive libel laws. Despite the fact that neither the plaintiff nor the defendant was a British citizen, the courts permitted the case.

Dr. Ehrenfeld refused to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the British court and chose not to defend the action. The British court issued a default judgment and ordered Dr. Ehrenfeld to pay each plaintiff £10,000 (and their accompanying legal fees), apologize, and destroy existing copies of her book.

Dr. Ehrenfeld was not bin Mahfouz’s only victim. Reports indicate he has sued or threatened suit in Britain at least 33 times in order to silence those who have accused him of knowingly funding terrorism. He has taken similar legal actions in Belgium, France and Switzerland.

The record is clear that libel judgments can lead to the financial ruin of authors and severely restrict their ability to publish in the future. Moreover, the mere prospect of a meritless foreign libel suit can chill speech by deterring the publication of books and articles that may subject the author to financial loss and reputational harm.

Libel tourism also affects publishers. In 1997, Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky sued Forbes magazine in a British court for publishing an article accusing him of substantial illegal activities and ties to organized crime. Rather than engage in a prolonged legal battle, Forbes reportedly settled with Mr. Berezovsky. Subsequently, Brazil issued a warrant for Mr. Berezovsky’s arrest on charges of fraud and money laundering.

Several states including New York, Illinois, California and Florida have taken action to prevent their citizens from suffering the penalties of foreign libel judgments; however, Federal action is necessary to ensure that all Americans are protected by the rights they are afforded under U.S. law.

This bill takes important steps toward achieving this goal. First, the bill would protect U.S. citizens by barring the enforcement of baseless foreign libel judgments in the United States. It would also permit U.S. citizens targeted by foreign libel judgments to seek and obtain a declaratory judgment in U.S. court that a foreign libel judgment is repugnant to the Constitution or laws of the United States. This will help U.S. victims of libel tourism clear their names. Because a libel judgment can prevent an author from publishing in the future, this section is critical to protecting Americans from the destructive effects of libel tourism.

Finally, the bill takes an initial step toward making practitioners of libel tourism financially responsible for their actions. Specifically, the bill would allow Americans to recover attorney’s fees incurred defending themselves against efforts to enforce a foreign libel judgment’s enforcement in the United States. But this bill will

But this bill will not, standing alone, eliminate the harm caused to Americans by baseless foreign libel lawsuits. After all, many plaintiffs never seek to enforce their judgments in the United States; Bin Mahfouz, for example, was content to deter publishers from distributing books overseas. And this law does not provide any recourse to Americans who have had foreign assets attached by a foreign court.

We believe that the Congress needs to pass broader measures that permit U.S. citizens accused of libel in foreign courts to force their accusers to pay for legal fees incurred abroad and, in certain cases, additional damages. Libel tourism will continue to pose problems for Americans until those who bring foreign libel lawsuits are faced with the same kinds of financial risks they seek to inflict on others.

We support this bill as a good first step toward addressing an important problem, but there is more that can, and should, be done. We look forward to working on additional measures to protect Americans from efforts to infringe on their free speech rights. JON KYL.

* The SPEECH Act: The Federal Response to “Libel Tourism” – Congressional Research Service, September 16, 2010

  • Summary:  The 111th Congress considered several bills addressing “libel tourism,” the phenomenon of litigants bringing libel suits in foreign jurisdictions so as to benefit from plaintiff-friendly libel laws. Several U.S. states have also responded to libel tourism by enacting statutes that restrict enforcement of foreign libel judgments. On August 10, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law the Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act (SPEECH Act), P.L. 111-223, codified at 28 U.S.C. §§ 4101-4105, which bars U.S. courts, both state and federal, from recognizing or enforcing a foreign judgment for defamation unless certain requirements, including consistency with the U.S. Constitution and section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. § 230), are satisfied. Although the SPEECH Act does not have an express preemption provision, it appears designed to preempt state laws on foreign libel judgments. It explicitly applies to all “domestic” courts, which it defines to include state courts notwithstanding contrary state law. Moreover, its legislative history suggests that Congress perceived a need for, and understood the SPEECH Act as establishing, a single uniform approach to the problem of foreign libel judgments against U.S. persons. 
* Free Speech Protection Act of 2009

Free Speech Protection Act of 2009, S.449

Sponsored by U.S. Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA), Joseph I. Lieberman (I-CT),  and Edward E. Kaufman (D-DE).

Free Speech Protection Act of 2009, H.R.1304

Sponsored by U.S. Representatives Peter T. King (R-NY-3), Shelley Berkley (D-NV-1), Trent Franks (R-AZ-2), Steve Israel (D-NY-2), Howard Coble (R-NC-6), Ted Poe (R-TX-2), Frank R. Wolf (R-VA-10), John B. Shadegg (R-AZ-3), Lynn A. Westmoreland (R-GA-3), Sue Wilkins Myrick (R-NC-9), Paul C. Broun (R-GA-10) and Edward R. Royce (R-CA-40).

Free Speech Protection Act of 2008

Free Speech Protection Act of 2008, S.2977

Sponsored by U.S. Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA), Joseph I. Lieberman (I-CT),  and Charles E. Schumer (D-NY).

Free Speech Protection Act of 2008, H.R.5814

Sponsored by U.S. Representatives Peter T. King (R-NY-3), Anthony Weiner (D-NY-9), Vito Fossella (R-NY-13), Howard Coble (R-NC-6), Ted Poe (R-TX-2), Sue Wilkins Myrick (R-NC-9), Edward R. Royce (R-CA-40), Paul C. Broun (R-GA-10), John B. Shadegg (R-AZ-3), Frank R. Wolf (R-VA-10), Christopher Shays (R-CT-4), Thaddeus G. McCotter (R-MI-11), Steve Israel (D-NY-2), Ken Calvert (R-CA-44), and Lynn A. Westmoreland (R-GA-3).

New York Libel Terrorism Protection Act of 2008

Chapter 66, Laws of New York, 2008

Sponsored by New York State Assembly Members Rory I. Lancman (D-25), Ellen C. Jaffee (D-95), Kenneth Paul Zebrowski (D-94), Ginny Fields (D-5), Thomas W. Alfano (R-21), Charles D. Lavine (D-13), Alan N. Maisel (D-59), David R. Koon (D-135), George S. Latimer (D-91), Barbara S. Lifton (D-125), David G. McDonough (R-19), and Amy Paulin (D-88).

Sponsored by New York State Senators Dean G. Skelos (R-9), Martin Golden (R-22), Dale Volker (R-59), John J. Bonacic (R-42), John A. DeFrancisco (R-50), John J. Flanagan (R-2), Charles J. Fuschillo, Jr. (R-8), Joseph A. Griffo (R-47), J. Kemp Hannon (R-6), William J. Larkin, Jr. (R-39), Vincent L. Leibell, III (R-40), Elizabeth O’Connor Little (R-45), Serphin R. Maltese (R-15), Carl L. Marcellino (R-5), Thomas P. Morahan (R-38), Frank Padavan (R-11), Mary Lou Rath (R-61), Joseph Robach (R-56), Caesar Trunzo (R-3), and George H. Winner Jr. (R-53).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor David A. Patterson on April 28, 2008.

Illinois Libel Terrorism Act

Public Act 095-0865

Sponsored by Illinois State Senators Ira I. Silverstein (D-8) and James A. DeLeo (D-10).

Sponsored by Illinois State Representative Lou Lang (D-16).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Rod R. Blagojevich on August 19, 2008.

Florida Act Relating to Nonrecognition of Foreign Defamation Judgments

Chapter 2009-232, Amending Section 55.605, Florida Statutes

Sponsored by Florida State Representatives Charles E. Van Zant (R-21), Janet H. Adkins (R-12), Kevin C. Ambler (R-47), Eric Eisnaugle (R-40), Adam M. Fetterman (D-81), Luis R. Garcia, Jr. (D-107), Richard Glorioso (R-62), Tom Grady (R-76), Adam Hasner (R-87), Ari Abraham Porth (D-96), Robert C. Schenck (R-44), William D. Snyder (R-82), Kelli Stargel (R-64) and Trudi K. Williams (R-75).

Sponsored by Florida State Senators Dave Aronberg (D-27) and Theodore E. Deutch (D-30).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Charles Crist on June 24, 2009.

California Anti-Libel Tourism Act

Chapter 579, California Statutes of 2009

Sponsored by California State Senator Ellen M. Corbett (D-10).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on October 11, 2009.

Utah Libel Amendments

Chapter 117, Laws of Utah 2010

Sponsored by Utah State Representative Julie Fisher (R-17).

Sponsored by Utah State Senator Patricia W. Jones (D-4).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Gary R. Herbert on March 23, 2010.

Tennessee Libel Terrorism Act

Chapter 900, Public Acts 2010

Sponsored by Tennessee State Representatives Gerald McCormick (R-26), Bill Dunn (R-16), Mike Bell (R-23), Tony Shipley (R-2), Jon Lundberg (R-1), Eric H. Swafford (R-25), Terri Lynn Weaver (R-40), Steve McManus (R-96), Jim Coley (R-97), Stacey Campfield (R-18), Mark White (R-83), Susan M. Lynn (R-57), Joey Hensley (R-70), Henry Fincher (D-42), Ron Lollar (R-99), Joe Towns, Jr. (D-84), and Mike Turner (D-51).

Sponsored by Tennessee State Senators Bill Ketron, Jr. (R-13), Dolores Gresham (R-26), Dewayne Bunch (R-9), Steve Southerland (R-1), Mae Beavers (R-17), Jack Johnson (R-23), and Charlotte Gentry Burks (D-15).

Passed by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Philip Norman Bredesen, Jr. on May 10, 2010.

Maryland Act Concerning Civil Proceedings – Foreign Defamation Judgments –Recognition, Enforceability, and Bases of Personal Jurisdiction

Chapter 658, Maryland Civil Actions and Procedures

Sponsored by Maryland Delegate Samuel I. Rosenberg (D-41).

Sponsored by Maryland State Senator Jamie Raskin (D-20).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Martin O’Malley on May 20, 2010. 

Louisiana Act to Restrict Recognition of Foreign Defamation Judgments

Act 712

Sponsored by Louisiana State Representative Ernest D. Wooton (R-105).

Passed unanimously by both chambers and signed into law by Governor Bobby Jindal on June 29, 2010.

Support for Legislation

Letter To Congress To Strengthen The “Libel Tourism” Bill, H.R. 2765

Letter RE: Support: Sb 320 Anti-Libel Tourism Act

Letter In Support Of The Libel Terrorism Protection Act

Letter To Governor Paterson In Support Of The Libel Terrorism Protection Act

Letter To Senator Ellen Corbett (D-10) Re: Senate Bill 320

The AAP Pushes For Expansion Of “Libel Tourism” Legislation

In Support Of The Free Speech Protection Act, S.449

RE: Libel Terrorism Protection Act, A.9652/S.6687

RE: The Free Speech Protection Act Of 2008

In Support Of The Libel Terrorism Protection Act

Re: The Threat Libel Tourism Poses To First Amendment Rights

ACLU Supports H.R. 2765 “Securing The Protection Of Our Enduring And Established Constitutional Heritage (Speech) Act”

In Support Of S.6687/A.9652 (“Libel Terrorism Protection Act”)

In Support Of The Free Speech Protection Act Of 2009, S.449